Reducing on array in OpenMP
Categories:
Efficient Reductions in OpenMP for Parallel Processing

Learn how to effectively use OpenMP's reduction clause to parallelize computations that aggregate results from multiple threads, ensuring correctness and performance.
In parallel programming, a common challenge arises when multiple threads need to contribute to a single shared variable, such as summing elements of an array or finding a minimum/maximum value. Directly accessing and modifying such a variable from multiple threads simultaneously can lead to race conditions and incorrect results. OpenMP's reduction
clause provides an elegant and efficient solution to this problem, allowing you to specify how shared variables should be aggregated across threads without explicit synchronization primitives.
Understanding the OpenMP Reduction Clause
The reduction
clause in OpenMP is designed to handle operations where a variable is updated by all threads, and the final value depends on the contributions of all threads. Instead of using locks or atomic operations, which can introduce overhead, OpenMP creates a private copy of the reduction variable for each thread. Each thread performs its part of the computation on its private copy. Once all threads complete their work, OpenMP automatically combines these private copies into the original shared variable using the specified reduction operator.
flowchart TD A[Start Parallel Region] --> B{Thread 1: Private Sum = 0} A --> C{Thread 2: Private Sum = 0} A --> D{Thread N: Private Sum = 0} B --> B1[Thread 1: Process subset of array] C --> C1[Thread 2: Process subset of array] D --> D1[Thread N: Process subset of array] B1 --> B2[Thread 1: Update Private Sum] C1 --> C2[Thread 2: Update Private Sum] D1 --> D2[Thread N: Update Private Sum] B2 & C2 & D2 --> E{Implicit Barrier & Reduction} E --> F[Combine Private Sums into Global Sum] F --> G[End Parallel Region]
Flow of an OpenMP reduction operation across multiple threads.
Common Reduction Operators and Their Usage
OpenMP supports a variety of predefined reduction operators, each with a specific initial value and combination logic. Choosing the correct operator is crucial for obtaining the desired result. Here are some of the most commonly used operators:
+
: Summation (initial value: 0)*
: Multiplication (initial value: 1)-
: Subtraction (initial value: 0, applied carefully)&
: Bitwise AND (initial value: ~0)|
: Bitwise OR (initial value: 0)^
: Bitwise XOR (initial value: 0)&&
: Logical AND (initial value: true)||
: Logical OR (initial value: false)min
: Minimum value (initial value: largest possible value for the data type)max
: Maximum value (initial value: smallest possible value for the data type)
The reduction
clause is typically used with for
loops or sections
constructs. The syntax is reduction(operator:list_of_variables)
.
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <numeric>
#include <limits>
int main() {
const int N = 1000000;
std::vector<int> data(N);
for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) {
data[i] = i + 1;
}
long long sum = 0;
int min_val = std::numeric_limits<int>::max();
int max_val = std::numeric_limits<int>::min();
#pragma omp parallel for reduction(+:sum) reduction(min:min_val) reduction(max:max_val)
for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) {
sum += data[i];
if (data[i] < min_val) {
min_val = data[i];
}
if (data[i] > max_val) {
max_val = data[i];
}
}
std::cout << "Sum: " << sum << std::endl;
std::cout << "Min: " << min_val << std::endl;
std::cout << "Max: " << max_val << std::endl;
// Verify with std::accumulate
long long expected_sum = std::accumulate(data.begin(), data.end(), 0LL);
std::cout << "Expected Sum: " << expected_sum << std::endl;
return 0;
}
Example of using multiple reduction clauses for sum, min, and max.
reduction
clause, separated by commas, or use multiple reduction
clauses as shown in the example. Ensure the initial value of your reduction variable matches the operator's identity element (e.g., 0 for +
, 1 for *
, true
for &&
).Custom Reductions and Performance Considerations
While OpenMP provides many built-in reduction operators, you might encounter scenarios requiring custom reduction logic. OpenMP 4.0 introduced the declare reduction
directive, allowing users to define their own reduction operators for custom data types or complex operations. This provides immense flexibility.
From a performance perspective, reductions are generally very efficient. OpenMP's implementation often uses a tree-based reduction algorithm, which minimizes synchronization overhead. However, excessive use of reductions on very small loops or with complex custom reduction functions can still introduce some overhead. Always profile your code to identify bottlenecks.
Consider the data locality and cache effects. If threads are accessing widely separated memory locations, cache misses can degrade performance. Structuring your loops to access contiguous memory blocks can help. For very large arrays, ensure your system has sufficient memory bandwidth to feed the parallel computations.
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <string>
#include <algorithm>
// Define a custom reduction for string concatenation
#pragma omp declare reduction(string_concat : std::string : omp_out = omp_out + omp_in) initializer(omp_priv = "")
int main() {
std::vector<std::string> words = {"Hello", " ", "OpenMP", " ", "Reductions", "!"};
std::string result_string = "";
#pragma omp parallel for reduction(string_concat:result_string)
for (size_t i = 0; i < words.size(); ++i) {
result_string = result_string + words[i];
}
std::cout << "Concatenated String: " << result_string << std::endl;
return 0;
}
Example of a custom reduction for string concatenation using declare reduction
.
initializer
provides the correct identity value for your operation. For string concatenation, an empty string ""
is the identity. An incorrect initializer can lead to wrong results.